Coding agents · Claude Code · Codex · Cursor

A config file
is not a control.

Coding agents arrive on developer laptops, running on your developers' own standing credentials, against your repos and your CI. Their permissions live in a settings file on each machine. Agen governs the same agents at runtime, per action, with a named human behind every one.

Governs the agents engineering already choseClaude CodeCodexCursorMCP serversCI runners
<30ms
per-action verdict at runtime
1:1
a named human behind every agent
1,000+
governed tools through the gateway
1 day
from connect to governing
Watch it happen

A coding agent reaches for a production secret. On a laptop.

It never crosses your network controls, and no log outside that machine records the attempt. AgenShield stops it on the device.

on-device block · live product scene
The adoption you inherited

Nobody signed off on it. You still answer for it.

Copilot adoption was a decision security was in the room for. Coding-agent adoption usually was not. One card per group in the comparison below.

01

A config file is not a control

Allow rules, deny rules and approval prompts sit in a settings file on each machine. They configure one tool on one device, they do not follow the developer to the next agent, and nothing outside that machine sees the decision.

enforcement scopeone machine
02

The agent is acting as your developer

It runs on standing credentials that already reach your repos and your CI. When something lands badly, the author field reads a person's name, and nothing on the machine can say whether that person chose the action or the agent did.

author fielda person's name
03

Every MCP server is another door

Jira, GitHub, the internal API, the production database. Each server the agent connects to widens what a single prompt can reach, and the allowlist deciding which ones are permitted lives in the same local file as everything else.

blast radiusgrows per server
04

Three tools, no console

Every coding agent has its own settings format, on every laptop that runs it. There is no central place to write a rule, no place to see what was decided, and nothing to hand an auditor who asks what your developers' agents did last quarter.

central policy consolenone
Configuration versus control

The settings file is real. It is also local.

Managed settings do real work, and engineering should keep them. They answer a different question than the one you are accountable for.

Configuration · per machine, per tool
  • ~/.claude/settings.jsonthis machine
  • ~/.codex/config.tomlthis machine
  • ~/.cursor/settings.jsonthis machine

Three formats, one per tool, on every laptop that runs one. No central verdict, no record anyone outside the machine can read, and nothing carries over when a developer switches agents.

Control · per action, per identity
One policy plane
  • Every action decided against the identity behind the agent, in under 30ms
  • Allow, mask, step up, hand to a human, or deny
  • Evidence recorded at action time, tied to a named owner
  • The same policy on the endpoint, the gateway, and the cloud
Engineering keeps the settings file. Security gets the verdict.
The comparison

What the settings file can do, and what it structurally cannot.

Agen against the controls coding agents ship with. Scored 0 to 5 on capability depth, capability by capability, including the rows the native controls win.

Capability depthNoneCompleteNative coding-agent controlsAgen.co
01 · Runtime enforcement
Verdict rendered at the moment of actionNative coding-agent controlsPer-call hooks, on the laptopStrong4/5Agen.coPer-action verdicts, <30msComplete5/5
Decision latency, published and measuredNative coding-agent controlsNot publishedNone0/5Agen.co<30ms, published, no samplingComplete5/5
Blocks a single action without disabling the agentNative coding-agent controlsDeny rules, per callComplete5/5Agen.coAction-level enforcementComplete5/5
Audit-first rollout mode before enforcingNative coding-agent controlsLog-only hook, self-builtBasic1/5Agen.coObserve-only modeComplete5/5
02 · Identity & accountability
A named human accountable for each agentNative coding-agent controlsSeats, not agent instancesBasic1/5Agen.coNamed owner, every agentComplete5/5
Each individual action attributed to that humanNative coding-agent controlsOff by default, your collectorCapable3/5Agen.coAttributed per actionComplete5/5
Access evaluated at action time, not only at grant timeNative coding-agent controlsMCP servers cleared at connectCapable3/5Agen.coJudged in context, per actionComplete5/5
Audit record per actionNative coding-agent controlsLocal to the machinePartial2/5Agen.coA record per actionComplete5/5
03 · Coverage
Endpoint enforcementNative coding-agent controlsManaged settings, client-sideStrong4/5Agen.coAgenShield on the deviceComplete5/5
MCP tool governanceNative coding-agent controlsAllowlists, per tool, per fileStrong4/5Agen.coMCP tools governed per callComplete5/5
Shadow-agent discoveryNative coding-agent controlsDocumented bypasses, no detectionBasic1/5Agen.coShadow AI surfacedComplete5/5
Browser enforcementNative coding-agent controlsOut of scopeNone0/5Agen.coBrowserShield, early accessCapable3/5
04 · Operate & buy
Prerequisite licensingNative coding-agent controlsA file on disk, any planComplete5/5Agen.coNo prerequisite tierComplete5/5
Depth inside the developer's own loopNative coding-agent controlsNative, no round tripComplete5/5Agen.coGoverns the tool, not inside itPartial2/5
Consoles to operateNative coding-agent controlsOne per tool, plus MDMPartial2/5Agen.coOne console, one policy planeComplete5/5
12 rows Agen.co leads2 tied1 row native controls leads
Levels reflect capability depth and supporting evidence. Capability descriptions based on the tools' public documentation, August 2026.
Watch it happen

The registry, naming names.

Every coding agent, its machine identity, and the human authority behind it, in one screen.

agent registry · live product scene
Platform capabilities

Find every coding agent. Decide every action. Enforce on the laptop.

Three capabilities on one identity fabric. Keep the tools engineering chose and keep the identity provider you already run; Agen governs on top of both. Days to a first governed agent, no agent recreation.

Select a capability

Continuous discovery across your IdP, gateway, devices, cloud, and registries. Nothing has to self-register: agents are found, risk-scored, and resolved to a named human before they act.

  • Agentless and API-based across five surfaces
  • First-party, custom, and third-party agents alike
  • Every agent mapped to an owner, approver, and escalation
Agen Discover AI agent discovery flow: any identity provider, productivity suites and assistants, cloud, gateway, endpoints, and MCP server registries all feed one agent registry where every AI agent is inventoried, risk-scored on arrival, given a named human owner, and shadow AI is surfaced.
Discovery pulls from five surfaces into a single agent registry — no SDK self-registration required.
ClosesWhich agents are running that nobody registered?
no SDK required5 surfacesowner-mapped
Discover in depth →

Before Agen.co by Frontegg, we felt forced to make impossible compromises between moving fast or protecting our product's trust and quality. Agen gave us a clear way to enable AI workflows for employees without losing control.
RACISO & CIO · RapydIn production
Agen for Work · internal workflowsAI assistants · workflow builders · custom agentsGuardrails · data masking · audit
Outcome 100% adoption across internal AI workflows.
Get the review

Coding-agent exposure review.

We come back with every coding agent we find, the credentials each one runs on, and whether a named human is accountable for it. Tell us anything we should know in the comments.

turnaround48 hours
formatline item
commitmentnone
FAQ

Questions, answered.

Do you replace Claude Code, Codex or Cursor?
No. Engineering keeps the tool it chose and the developer workflow does not change. Agen governs what those agents do against your systems, per action, on one policy plane.
How is this different from the settings files the tools already ship with?
Those files configure one tool on one machine. They enforce nothing centrally, they do not follow the developer to the next agent, and they produce no per-action record tied to a named human. Agen decides each action centrally against the identity behind the agent, and records the chain as evidence at the moment the action happens.
Does this mean installing something on every developer laptop?
Discovery does not. It is agentless and API-based across your identity provider, gateway, cloud, devices and registries. AgenShield is optional and ships through the MDM you already run when you want enforcement on the device itself.
Will this slow developers down?
A verdict comes back in under 30ms and the overwhelming majority of actions are allowed outright. Step-up and human-in-the-loop only fire when an action crosses a policy you wrote. Observe-only mode is available if you want to watch before you enforce anything.
What about the MCP servers the agents connect to?
They are brokered through the gateway: 150+ governed connectors and 1,000+ governed tools, every call scoped to the task and attributed to the human behind the agent.
What is in the exposure review?
Every coding agent we find, the credentials each one runs on, and whether a named human is behind it. Line item, within 48 hours, no commitment.